thecodexes.com
Quick start in 3 stepsAll guides

Step 1 Review Book

One tool in thecodexes.com system.

ChartWalk study tabs, source detail

At your pace. Replay from Support.

Close at any time. Your study progress stays in place.

Reading tools: mark, remember, returnReturn to the reader ↗

How tools connect

One topic. Connected learning.

Each resource is one tool in thecodexes.com system. Learn the fact, use it in a new situation and retrieve it later.

Your role: Build the mechanism that the other tools help you apply, recognize and retrieve.

Review Book → explain the mechanism → QuestionBook/QBank → image or Visual Companion when useful → flashcard recall → return to the topic for any missing link.

  1. Review Book

    Understand. Explain the mechanism, clinical rule and exception.

  2. Visual Companion

    Trace. Rehearse the pathway or case where available.

  3. QuestionBook + QuestionBank

    Apply. Commit, compare alternatives and test a new presentation.

  4. Image bank

    Recognize. Describe the finding and connect it to the decision.

  5. Flashcards

    Retrieve. Recall the fact and its reason before revealing.

  6. Audio Notes

    Reinforce. When available, pause and recall before the explanation.

Let each gap guide your next step.

A question or recall miss points to a weak link. Repair it in the Review Book, clarify it with a pathway or image, then retrieve and test it again.

Each tool strengthens the work done in the others: understanding guides practice, practice exposes gaps, and visual recognition plus retrieval helps you use the corrected fact again.

Carry the topic ID or concept between available tools. Use topic links where provided, or search. Access varies; some resources remain in development. Start with the tool that addresses your gap.

Find related resources in MyCodexes ↗

Study tips · Step 1 Review Book

How much should I do first?

Start with one concept. Read enough to explain the mechanism or clinical rule, close the page, then try a related question. Repair one weak link before adding another topic.

How do I make the facts useful?

Explain the cause, its consequence and the finding it predicts. For tables or graphs, retain the comparison, conditions, units and direction of change.

How should I use the alternatives?

Use Watch for as a retrieval prompt. Explain the Trap and distinguish the closest look-alike in Do not confuse. Keep Numbers with their population, units, timing and exceptions.

How do I repair a miss?

Record item/topic, confidence, missed clue or link, error type, corrected rule and a retest prompt. Repair the narrow gap in the Review Book, then attempt a different presentation after a delay.

How do I connect the books?

Use the explanation and Pearl to identify the mechanism, then find the matching Review Book topic. Step 1 explanations do not all print review-page locators. QuestionBook QR codes identify the question resource.

What counts as understanding?

Explain the reason, separate a plausible alternative and apply the rule to changed facts. Recheck after a delay. Book percentages and repeated-item familiarity do not establish a validated exam-score prediction.

Complete example · scroll to read

thecodexes.com · Step 1 Review Book

Three steps to begin.

Part of one connected system

Build the mechanism that the other tools help you apply, recognize and retrieve.

Review Book → explain the mechanism → QuestionBook/QBank → image or Visual Companion when useful → flashcard recall → return to the topic for any missing link.

1. Choose one concept.

Open a topic. Read its key facts and comparison. Use the Exam skills line to decide what you need to explain.

Ask yourself: What should I be able to explain?

2. Explain the mechanism.

Follow the Mechanism ladder. Explain why each arrow follows, then predict what changes next. Check any missing link in the key facts.

Ask yourself: Can I explain why the finding occurs?

3. Retrieve, then apply.

Close the page. Explain the mechanism and distinguish its closest look-alike. Check Do not confuse, then try a related question.

Ask yourself: Which finding separates the two?